sci.physics.particle

On Mar 2, 6:54=A0am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" wrote:
> May I suggest that quarks are compound particles based on electrons-
> positrons and gluon-photons?
> see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/introduction.html

Impressive and not bad--hav you looked at q=3Dsupergenium>? One quark, many gluonic wavelets. And the neutrino
is a pi=F2n-lept=F2n atom thas belongs above the perihodic tabul as a gas
leihter than monohydrogen. (They should look for trineutrino decays
at beamheads.) But how do you account for e/3 and 2e/3?

the three forti=E6, by New Model:

coloral bound: three bodies, three axes -|+1,+2|-> full coverway:
asumptotic freedom, infinite outter potential--unless finite potential
in manier dimensions
el=E8ctrionic bound: two bodies, two axes -|-2,-1|-> half coverway:
logarithmic freedom, finite outter potential
gravoral bound: one body, one axis -|-2,0,+2|-> empty coverway;
paravolic freedom, exfinite outter potential--unless finite potential
in fewer dimensions

Exfinite is equivalent with nihil, and is how the univers can sprout
from no matter-energy.

Einstein with a 161-IQ couldn't recken the above. And neither could
all of the academic dumbasses who insist the nuclear weak interaction
is a fundamental forse, even thouh its quanta are massive and their
range finite.

> If fermions are propeller shaped particles and balck hole horzons =A0are
> able to FLIP their spin state.

Paths are not bodies.

-Aut