sci.physics.electromag

"hanson" wrote in message
news:wTfIj.8284$QW6.5590@trnddc07...
| "Androcles" wrote in message
| news:cdyHj.37287$w51.31550@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > "hanson" wrote in message
| > news:5EvHj.1380$p97.1094@trnddc03...
| > | "Androcles" wrote in message
| > | news:DflFj.312642$3m6.167466@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > | >
| > | > "hanson" wrote in message
| > | > news:maiFj.4737$Oj5.4452@trnddc06...
| > | > | "Androcles" wrote in message
| > | > | news:yGhFj.64867$M9.35732@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > | > | > The link again is:
| > | > | > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Orbit/Orbit.xls
| > | > | >
| > | > | hanson wrote:
| > | > | NOW that your link arrived, double clicking on it worked just
fine.
| > | < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3760e9bcc757513d>
| > | >
| > | Androcles wrote:
| > | < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/1b962698cba7fb01>
| > | > Copernicus.exe (which I wrote over 15 years ago) allows
| > | > for 10,000,000 points. 100,000,000 points and you need a
| > | > faster computer. I'm not planning on increasing the point count
| > | > for a spreadsheet.
| > | > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/LCV.htm
| > | >
| > | > | hanson wrote:
| > | > | Shit! Gotta run! Pool pump in the grotto just "exploded"
| > | > | Water's all over!... ahahahaha.... lata alligata!....
| > | > |
| > | Androcles wrote:
| > | > Thanks for your help, it is appreciated. Now go fix the pool pump.
| > | > |
| > | hanson wrote:
| > | ahaha... AHAHAHA... your all heart, Andro... Kelperian orbits
| > | first!... ahahaha... --- But no, I didn't fix the pump. I couldn't
| > bring
| > | my heart to do it when I saw the "little twits" having the time of
| > | their young lives having great fun under their new "waterfall"...
| > | So, I checked whether there were any el. shock dangers and
| > | there were not. A faulty safety valve had burst and created
| > | a huge "fountain"... ahahaha... So, I let'em play under it for an
| > | hour until they got bored. -- We celebrated Easter here, in
| > | Raratonga, with the tribe and staffs united. After few days they
| > | all left, back to their own lairs and salt mines or sugar loafs.
| > | That's when the crews will come for clean up and do repairs
| > | and maintenance.
| > | >
| Androcles wrote:
| > Sounds like the "faulty" safety valve was doing its job. :-)
| >
| hanson wrote:
| > | Anyway, now we can gp back to your Keplerian Orbit plots ,
| > | ... [1].
| > | for which you say to have no plans to "increase the point count".
| > | But listen man, if I were as interested as you are in searching
| > | for new ways to look at things I'd give that some more attention.
| >
| Androcles wrote:
| > I shoved it out to a nice round 100, improved the plot, added
| > the centre and the focus.
| > Also you can see the data in columns J and K.
| > If you know how to use Excel you can unhide the columns, but I fail to
| > see how a thousand entries in a column would be useful. It can be done
| > but it would make the program 10 times larger.
| >
| hanson wrote"
| > | I thought that YOU were after a novel way for you to see & explain
| > | gravitational n-body interactions, in an analog fashion like you
| > | did for the light intensity/freq. curves in your
| > |
| > | >
| > | A refinement in [1] by/with tilting the view angle onto the ellipses
| > | until they become perfect circles ought to give you the loci of the
| > | gravitational zero/balance-points (like L3/L4 etc), those positions
| > | in 3D space which may be used for to find solutions for the old
| > | 3-body/n-body problem. -- Go for it if it strikes your fancy.
| > | Good luck and take care, Andro,
| > | hanson
| >
| Androc les wrote:
| > That would be outside the purview of Kepler's equal areas in equal
| > times law.
| > Key here is that because the time between points is always
| > the same, the distance between points is a measure of velocity.
| > Because the velocity of light HAS to be source dependent (despite
| > the crank Einstein's claims to the contrary) and Algol CANNOT be
| > an eclipsing binary (despite the 18-year-old Goodricke's theory)
| > (see http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm )
| > the light curve of Algol is generated by Copernicus.exe by a star
| > in orbit with a large body, in close agreement with
| >
| > "HD 189733 may not seem to be remarkable, but it is known to have at
least
| > one hot, jupiter-sized planet orbiting very close, with an impressively
| > short period of 2.2 days.
| > (see http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080321.html )
| >
| > Thus the extent to which Einstein's crackpottery has led the world
| > astray is truly astronomical.
| >
| hanson wrote:
| "Androcles" wrote
| > Why a circular orbit doesn't help with Lagrange:
| > < http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Orbit/Orbit.htm >
| >
| hanson wrote:
| Yo, Andro, that is a wonderful depiction and very elegant...
| I reposted your post here as a follow-up to these 2 posts here in
| Re: "Andro's Keplerian orbit plot & the n-body problem
|
|
| Say, Andor, have you tried to offer your Website contents to some
| Uni for pedagogic purposes?. You should. You really should.
| Thanks and take care man,
| hanson
|
It's there for all to see.
I need to clean up Orbit.html, add it to the index, but I doubt
any Uni profs would be pleased to have their life's work teaching
Einstein's garbage trashed.