sci.physics.particle

On Mar 6, 2:15=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Mar 5, 1:33 pm, Michael Helland wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 5, 8:52 am, Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 5, 8:21 am, Uncle Al wrote:
>
> > > > Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > > > > Both Einstein and Newton looked at the universe like this:
>
> > > > > Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
>
> > > > [snip crap]
>
> > > > Poison the well and every sip is poisoned. =A0By misrepresenting oth=
ers'
> > > > work you do not validate your own hallucinatory desires.
>
> > > There is no mis-representation.
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/msg/1fd692de4b6e5c4=
d
>
> > > There are enough Newton and Einstein cites in that
> > > sci.physics.research message to support what should be well known,
> > > that Newton and Einstein were influenced by Descartes and Spinoza.
>
> > It is well known that until the Copenhagen Interpretation of QM, most
> > thinkers in the world viewed the universe like this:
>
> > Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
>
> > There's plenty evidence in Newton and Einstein's writing to suggest
> > they belonged to the same tradition.
>
> > Those are facts you'd like to deny, probably because you're more in
> > tune with the Copenhagen Interpretation.
>
> ....and how much of the mathematics of QM do you even know? Have you
> ever solved the Schroedinger equation?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--------------
have you ever solved the Schrodinger equation
fo say
the Lead Atom ??

Y.P
------------------------------