sci.physics.electromag

On Mar 9, 3:25=A0pm, "FrediFizzx" wrote:
> I guess you didn't carefully read my other postings or you would have
> known that I did in fact explain it loosely. =A0Whether it is correct or
> not is to be determined. =A0The explanation also makes fields very real
> physical entities by definition. =A0Going further, if my Quantum Vacuum
> Charge (QVC) =3D sqrt(hbar*c) theory is correct in CGS units, then fields
> are a very real physical thing. =A0Of course, the whole hypothesis is
> based on assuming fields are real to start with. =A0That is how I was able=

> to derive QVC.

Ah! CGS was one of the wherefores I chidid your charge; CGS's
dimensional analusis is bullshit. If you would put in the k under the
root, and take the greater h, you would fetch my Planck charge:
http://google.com/groups?q=3DPlanck-charge. Pick out my name and see
thas my post was soon after my leave from usenet, the internet, and
computer as the gap in my profile's history shows. So I was one of
the elite who made this derivation. However, another wherefore yours
was wrong is your reducted Planck's constant 'h', which recovers a
smaller charge (11.7e rather than 29.3e), which is in-deed not the
charge between a linear interaction but the "arccharge", where each
half must somehow trace a circular orbit and never reach
recombination, so they don't even get to make the radiation whose
wavespan is the same as the motespan. Whereas my h uses the original
Planck's identity. 15 MeV is merely the equilibrial vacval state for
a charge cluster--however, one must first squash all the charges into
the lone charge's size which is innatural. The identity thus takes a
shoehorn, or a girdle, to work and I would not be surprised if the
Planck charge is as trivial as the impedanse of the vacvum, which
itself is a shoehorn of two independent states--its use is only
special as a quasiarbitrary standard, such as the counting of galactic
nuclei's mass in terms of our sun's.

-Aut