Group: humanities.philosophy.objectivism
From: skysi
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Why beauty is objective (the other post on this got too long-winded)

On Apr 10, 9:36 am, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote:
> Reggie Perrin wrote:
>
> Relational properties are grounded in facts external to the observer.
> Left and right can be determined from the co-ordinates of the objects,
> for example. The rrelational properties of -sets- of objects are
> intrinsic to the sets themselves, not the observers.
>
> Bob Kolker

Robert, you keep talking about "opinion" and you never mentioned
"subjective" or "objective". We all know that everyone has an opinion
on beauty that's a little, or often a lot different from that of
another person. What does it have to do with philosophical categories?
I gave you my reasoning for regarding beauty as objective, where is
yours? Pick any of the tree and give me your reasoning for that, if
you care of course.

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass