Group: humanities.philosophy.objectivism
From: Malrassic Park
Date: Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Universal vs. Property

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:18:56 -0700, Mark N
wrote:

>Malrassic Park wrote:
.
>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:27:19 -0700, Mark N
>> wrote:
.
>>>>Your idea of the ontological argument completely lacks the idea of
>>>>'excellence,' so if you want to know what's wrong with your version of
>>>>it, start there.
.
>>> OK, I'll get right on that. Thanks for the advice.
.
>> Wow, sounds like you're a real great philosopher there, Mark
>> N.

.
>Well, I'm no Malrassic Park, that's for sure! ;-)
.
>But seriously, it's pretty silly for you to try to insult me by saying
>that I'm not a "great philosopher," considering that I have never
>claimed to be any kind of philosopher at all!
.
Maybe so, but ARE you a Philosopher? Check out:

http://everything2.com/e2node/Ansir
-

"I am afraid that I idealize Hickman and that he
might not be this at all. In fact, he probably
isn't. But it does not make any difference. If he
isn't, he could be, and that's enough."

Journals of Ayn Rand, Feb. 1928

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass