humanities.philosophy.objectivism

In article <11d14876-6699-4682-9639-9147ec27c754
@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, cbell97@bellsouth.net says...
> On Apr 1, 10:28 pm, Gordon Sollars wrote:
>
> > > Exactly so, SCOTUS has no business deciding on any issue at Gitmo, for
> > > example.
> >
> > When you aren't busy listening to Rush, try to look up a case called
> > Marbury v. Madison.
>
> You picked the one case where SCOTUS abrogated to itself to do that
> which was never proscribed to it by the Constitution. If SCOTUS
> continues seizure of power, using "judicial review" as an excuse, it
> should be time to get rid of SCOTUS.

Marbury v. Madison is central to American jurisprudence. Look, why
should we listen to some Internet goof? Come back when you know
something of the law, or at least can entertain us by quoting an
argument by someone else.

--
Gordon