humanities.philosophy.objectivism

On Mar 15, 2:17 pm, Reggie Perrin wrote:
> I was merely warning Gordon of what he was getting himself into; what
> he chooses to do with that information is obviously up to him.

Bullshit. Like Gordon and Mark haven't seen ARI apologists slam me a
zillion times. This is simply a case that because you decided to
"plonk" me, you think they should follow suit.

> There is a long-established distinction in international law between
> pre-emption and prevention

Your missing what I'm debating here. There are all sorts of dumb laws
and ideas out there. I don't think it is wrong to question them when
we have a little supporting evidence to suggest they may not be such a
bright idea (e.g. Iraq, Iran next? ).

What I am saying is the distinction between "premptive" and
"preventative" war on a practical level it no longer useful (if it
ever was). Now people don't have to agree with each other in the
end.. that's fine.... but I think the debate is still worthwhile
having. (I myself have learned several things from both Mark and
Gordon in this exchange)