Group: humanities.philosophy.objectivism
From: Malrassic Park
Date: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: On solving the problem of universals

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:01:40 -0700, Charles Bell
wrote:


>Before I can respond to anything you have said (as if it is worth the
>effort!) I would like you to comment on Rand's definition of concept-
>formation involving omission of measurement. Every time you complain
>about the lack of finding a "universal man" in humanness you
>completely overlook Rand's answer to that pseudo-problem.

I'm not complaining, I said I found it in the mind. Universals are
concepts of method used in the formation of classes of entities.

If it's not worth the effort, then don't do it. I'd hate to see you
having to make a sacrifice on the part of a lower value such as my
posting.
--
We usually go over the top w/ our new found freedoms.
Unfortunately, her 'followers' are as radical as Pat
Robertson's. Discernment goes out the window.
- A youtube poster

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass