humanities.philosophy.objectivism

On Mar 23, 9:53 am, Jim Klein wrote:
> On Mar 23, 10:44 am, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > So what does "part of the Sun" really mean other than considered part
> > of the Sun due to reasons of cognitive necessity and convenience?
>
> Uh...the part of the Sun that was considered due to those reasons?

Absolutely, except it's no longer part of the Sun.

> When you take away the consideration, you don't take away that
> part of the Sun. Lemme know when you get it.

No, you take away that it was part of the Sun. It still is just as it
was before, it's just not part of the Sun anymore.

If we stop considering the corona to be part of the Sun, it stops
being part of the Sun. The same applies to the rest of the Sun.

DS