Jim Klein wrote:
>
> And regardless of whatever pairuvdihedron the orbit
> might be, is it at least the case that it is THAT? Or does
> it rest upon our conceptualization of it? That's the
> question in this thread. What say you about that?
>
> Or maybe Betsy or David wants to answer---are
> SHAPES created in our consciousness too, or is
> it just relationships? My guess--Betsy no, David yes.
Extension is out there. Shape is in here. Descartes described matter as
res extensa. Something with extension.
Bob Kolker
>
> In memory of Dorothy Fanyo: "WHOOIIEE!!!"
Amen! I miss the old gal. She was something else, wasn't she?