On Mar 3, 9:30 pm, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote:
> TC wrote:
> > Then how do you account for the goodness of fit from 1700-1800?
> What goodness of fit. We do not have good data between 1700 and 1800.
Proxy data is presented in
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~nathan/pdf/matthewsetal2004.pdf
for 1700-1800
Tom