humanities.philosophy.objectivism

On Feb 23, 11:54 am, Fred Weiss wrote:
> On Feb 22, 5:52 am, Potroast wrote:
>
> > How would this story had been written if Christians or Jews were the
> > targets and the perps had been Arab?
>
> Of far more relevance and importance is how this story is written when
> the target is free speech - and the perps, as usual, are Muslim thugs.
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/17/wikipedia.islam?gusr...
> eed=worldnews

Changing the subject matter doesn't dismiss the point. As I
said....where are Oists defending AMERICAN lives from white supremest
terrorism?

I fail to see how their being moderate Muslims makes them an iota
less American then you are.(unless you buy into that crap about
American being founded on Vatican principles). So where is your moral
outrage when brown shirts are terrorizing moderate Muslim Americans?
Why are you staying quiet about swastikas? I guess its OK for white
supremest thugs to terrorize Americans..... when you specifically
aren't the target right? That suspiciously sounds like the mentality
of a 1930-ish German citizen.

You see the problem with some Oist's logic here is they've made
their target entirely too big and expect to win allies. And again this
thinking is similar to a certain someone who sixty years ago opened up
one to many fronts.

By not going out of their way to defend the rights of moderate
American Muslims.... Oists appear like they are going after all of
them... which once again brings back imagery of a certain someone with
a decidedly unfashionable mustache.

Unsurprisingly Oists, much like Muslim radicals, end up alienating
all of America's traditional allies that had to endure that under a
certain someone (and even most Americans)..

Hint: Genocide ain't gonna happen on our watch. If you want to make us
believe this isn't your cause... start defining Muslims you are
willing to indeed live with... and then start defending them in
practice not theories. ( I certainly do my part)