humanities.philosophy.objectivism

Diana Hsieh writes:

... it's not a discussion list. The point is to use the
list in order to facilitate and promote debate with the
general public.

Will the list have a public archive then? It might be
useful for some people to have read-only access to such a
resource--people who might not fit the relevant criteria for
write access. (Since your description does not make it
sound as if the intended content would need to secret from
the general public.)