humanities.philosophy.objectivism

On Mar 3, 11:23 pm, Brian Bagnall wrote:

> Sanctions and "international community" don't work either. We had sanctions
> against Cuba and Iraq and they did nothing.

Seemed to work fine against he soviet union. You know Hitler hated the
League of nations and withdrew from it prior to the war. The UN isn't
a world governing body like some conspiracy theorists like to argue. .
All it is a few buildings and some pencil pushers so treaties and
agreements can be arranged easier without having to always do things
from scratch. A convenience more than anything.

> Just be friendly and trade with all. That's how we turned Vietnam around.

I agree with you there. Getting the hell out of Vietnam helped.

> Just leave them the hell alone, that's all that needs to be done.

Leave who the hell alone? Hitler? Mussolini? I would if they wanted to
leave me alone.

> meddling. Damn socialists and globalists can't help but put their fingers in
> every pie they see.

Except that I am not a a socialist!! I'm swing (the guys that
usually decide elections :) Not everyone prioritizes their voting
according to taxation. The leaders that I think will lead to less
coercion is how I vote in the nuclear age. (in real terms of violence
occurring as opposed to the threat of force which I view differently)

Ideally right wing but unfortunately the right seems to have the
habit of occasionally getting carried away with the testosterone So
I float between the two parties depending how obsessed each leader is
with punishing someone.

btw- How can you freely trade with other nations without globalization
naturally occuring? What do you define as "globalization"?