alt.education

JM wrote:
>On Feb 11, 7:17 pm, Richo wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 12:22 pm, Doctor Robert wrote:> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 wrote:
>>
>> > >ExpelledMovie News Flash Issue 2 w13
>>
>> > >EXPELLEDteams up with the Discovery Institute to launch the
>> > >Academic Freedom Petition,EXPELLEDreceives endorsements from
>> > >James Dobson and more!
>>
>>
>>
>> It might be unintentionally funny in the same way as "Reefer Madness"
>> - as an inept propaganda film - but I would not want to give any of
>> these people my money.
>>
>> These anti-science nutjobs are not *really* funny - they are actually
>> dangerous.
>>
>> Cheers, Mark.
>
>Anti-science? Science had to rebuke the evolutionists

Science had to do no such thing. Science does find errors that are
made, but that is the point.

>for promoting gill slits in mammalian embryos,

They looked like gill slits. As we learned more, we realized that
they weren't. That is how science works. No "rebuke" is necessary.

>for teaching about piltdown man in textbooks,

Piltdown Man was a hoax by non-scientists.

>I guess anti-
>science evolutionists have to keep pushing their views on everyone.

If you ever find an anti-science "evolutionist" let us know.

lojbab