"James Beck"
news:MPG.2228bc94a225a76c98a495@newsgroups.bellsouth.net...
| In article
| Kenthz@comcast.net says...
| > James Beck wrote:
| >
| > > In article <8oidncXKzaU6aSDanZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
| > > Kenthz@comcast.net says...
| > >
| > >>James Beck wrote:
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>>In article
| > >>>Kenthz@comcast.net says...
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>>James Beck wrote:
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>>>In article
corneliusjmchugh@yahoo.ie
| > >>>>>says...
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>>>Evidence that changes with each new revision.
| > >>>>>>
| > >>>>>>Unlike your Big Book of Goatfucker Fairytales. Bollocksology then,
| > >>>>>>bollocksology now, bollocksology forever.
| > >>>>>>
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>
| > >>>>>The interesting thing is this was meant as an insult or such.
| > >>>>>The fact that SCIENCE can absorb and work with new information is
its'
| > >>>>>strength. Religion, on the other hand, has its' rules and
information
| > >>>>>set in stone and, apparently, that is to be reveled in by the
faithful.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>When 'SCIENCE can absorb' the metaphysical into its corpus it
becomes
| > >>>>religion. You worship the religion Science (Seance), eh?
| > >>>>
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>Spent one to many days in philosophy 101?
| > >>
| > >>Care to elaborate? BAGL
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>>"When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in
| > >>>numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it,
| > >>>when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager
and
| > >>>unsatisfactory kind: it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you
have
| > >>>scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the state of science."
| > >>>William Thompson, Lord Kelvin
| > >>
| > >>You can lie with numbers, same as any other language.
| > >>
| > >
| > > Numbers never lie.
| > > The people that manipulate them and try to interpret them do.
| >
| > Numbers have no life without people.
| >
| Like I said before, spent too much time in that philosophy 101 class?
| Prove to me you exist.
|
| Jim
They cannot prove a TREE exist, how are they going to explain you exist or
believe God exists.
|
|
|