Group: alt.energy.renewable
From: "daestrom"
Date: Monday, March 24, 2008 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: YES, mechanical perpetual motion generator based on the Coriolis effect is going to work (JP)


"Bret Cahill" wrote in message
news:b2630e2c-f11b-4c08-a94e-6409e66f1e68@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> > Take that up with Euler.
>
>> Coming from the same guy that doesn't know what moment of inertia is.
>
> Until you show how to derive rotational KE, then no one will think you
> have anything to contribute.
>
> I just proved it won't work:
>

No, you just proved that it's not practical to get 1 GW out of a single
unit.

You haven't proved you can't get *any* power out of the idea.

Learn to tell the difference.

daestrom
P.S. BTW, you can *not* get any power from a constrained flywheel from the
earth's rotation. I'll leave the proof as an exercise for you.

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass