Group: alt.energy.renewable
From: "daestrom"
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: YES, mechanical perpetual motion generator based on the Coriolis e


"David Williams" wrote in message
news:1205634348.916.1205629306@bayman.org...
>-> So, with regards to the subject line? Your opinion is???
>
> -> daestrom
>

>
> There are, of course, machines that work by extracting energy from
> large natural reservoirs, such as the earth's rotation. Anything that
> works off the tides, for example, does that. Such machines are real,
> and occasionally useful, but they aren't perpetual motion machines. The
> kinetic energy of the earth's rotation is huge, but it isn't infinite.
> If energy is extracted from it, it will eventually run out.
>
> I haven't read the details of this "Coriolis" machine, but it may
> possibly use the earth's rotation as a source of energy. If so, it may
> be a worthwhile invention, but not a perpetual motion machine.
>

So, you "haven't read the details...", yet you've been ranting and replying
to this thread.

And you still haven't shared with us your opinion about the the machine
mentioned in the subject line other than, "Such machiensa re real and
occastionally useful...."

Do you consider this particular machine "...real and occasionally useful..."

daestrom

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass