alt.energy.renewable

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:22:06 -0700, oriel36 wrote:


>
> You are used to applying terrestrial ballistics to planetary motion to
> account for Keplerian orbital geometries ,specifically Newton's agenda but
> it appears that Keplerian geometries,on account of the existence of those
> fragile rings may be due to a combination of planetary heliocentric motion
> and the Sun's galactic orbital motion,in short,it is the Sun's forward
> motion which produces the orbital geometries rather than something
> intrisic to planetary heliopcentric motion.
>
> It is a whole different ball game,you can't budge from your antiquated
> jargon and I am certainly not going to try to change your grade school
> views,too dull and dismal to be anything productive and besides,there is
> an astrological core at the heart of all your pretensious nonsense.

Get back to us when you can calculate interplanetary trajectories better
than present theory.