alt.energy.renewable

On Feb 27, 11:50 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
> janpa...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Our scientists are so succesful in telling us that perpetual motion
> > generators cannot be build, that we are scared to even try to build
> > one.
>
> Many people build what the think or claim are perpetual motion
> machines. Some of the builders fool themselves... but most just
> try to fool others for glory or profit.
>
> Mother nature cannot be fooled... It doesn't take that much
> education to understand why.

Dear Sam: I agree 100%! (That's so rare for us!) If by "Coriolis"
you refer to the forces that cause storms to rotate differently in the
N. and the S. hemisphere, any energy advantage results from SOLAR
energy differentials which cause the winds (or the water draining from
a bathtub) to rotate in the first place. So this could never be a
perpetual motion machine, because it has outside energy input.
When I was in grammar school, one of my first "attempts" at doing
science was to design what I thought was a perpetual motion machine.
I hadn't heard of a thing called... friction, however. An uncle
explained that friction would kill my idea. That "prize" is going to
be safe for a long, long time! -- NoEinstein --