Group: alt.energy.renewable
From: janpajak@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: YES, mechanical perpetual motion generator based on the Coriolis effect is going to work (JP)

On Mar 19, 12:14=A0am, oriel36 wrote:
=2E..
> Considering that there is a new orbital component to look at,why
> bother remaining with a useless framework which prevents any
> productive work from being done.

The reason to look at simpler solutions first is to accomplish a
success and to prove principles in a simplest possible manner. Only
when principles are proven in such a simple manner, e.g. through
employing principles of the inertial flywheel described here, more
inductrialy feasible versions of the same flywheel can be completed.
These more promising versions are outlibnes briefly at the blog from
addresses
http://www.getablog.net/totalizm
http://totalizm.wordpress.com
http://totalizm.myblog.net
http://www.newfreehost.com/weblog/?u=3Dgod

Witht he totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

P.S. Anyway, I see and appreciate your determination to agree to
disagree. Where I can see your perfect device at work?

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass