alt.energy.renewable

On Mar 7, 1:37=A0pm, "dkel...@hotmail.com" wrote:
=2E..
> =A0First, force without motion is not power.
=2E..

The point which you seem to overlook here is that the flywheel that we
are discussing is actually moving (ratating). It makes one revolution
per day. It is NOT much and in such technical version it cannot be
utilised for giving out perpetual free energy. However, it is perfect
for proving to all these close-minded people who believe in claims of
the orthodox science that "perpetual motion" is impossible, that in
reality the perpetual motion is possible to accomplish, and even is
easy to accomplish. Building perpetual motion devices is like building
windmils, only that these devices must utilise the perpetually
propelling phenomenon instead of the wind.

We must remember also, that the flywheel discussed here can be
improved further. The method of this improvement is already described
on blogs of totalizm from internet addresses http://www.getablog.net/totaliz=
m
, http://totalizm.wordpress.com , http://totalizm.myblog.net , and
http://www.newfreehost.com/weblog/?u=3Dgod . Namely it can be replaced
by a whole system of such flywheels. In turn such a system has many
advantages - e.g. can increase its momentum of inertia due to the
centrifugal effect, and also can mutually propell each other. In turn,
from the behaviour of water particles acted upon by the Coriolis
effect, we can expect that forces which propel the rotation of this
flywheel will still propel it when it is already rotating. In this way
its "revolution per ..." component can be increased almost limitless,
and thus the power copmponent can be improved. So there is a chance,
that after building the first such flywheel, and after researching it
to determine its properties, we can build systems of such flywheels
that are going to supply a lot of free energy. At least enough energy
to be feasable as souces of free energy for individual households.

With the totaliztyc salute,
Jan Pajak