alt.energy.renewable

On 16 Mar, 20:48, Bill Ward wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:22:06 -0700, oriel36 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You are used to applying terrestrial ballistics to planetary motion to
> > account for Keplerian orbital geometries ,specifically Newton's agenda b=
ut
> > it appears that Keplerian geometries,on account of the existence of =A0t=
hose
> > fragile rings may be due to a combination of planetary heliocentric moti=
on
> > and the Sun's galactic orbital motion,in short,it is the Sun's forward
> > motion which produces the orbital geometries rather than something
> > intrisic to planetary heliopcentric motion.
>
> > It is a whole different ball game,you can't budge from your antiquated
> > jargon and I am certainly not going to try to change your grade school
> > views,too dull and dismal to be anything productive and besides,there is=

> > an astrological core at the heart of all your pretensious nonsense.
>
> Get back to us when you can calculate interplanetary trajectories better
> than present theory.

Under close scrutiny,there is no possible means to link terrestrial
ballistics with planetary orbital motion using the framework which
Newton worked off -

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Tiempo_sid%C3%A9reo.en.pn=
g

That graphical representation represents a framework of 3 years of 365
days and 1 year of 366 days rather than the astronomically accurate
365 days 5 hours 49 minutes for the annual orbital motion of the
Earth.

If you can fit the Earth's motions into the calendar system,or more
precisely the particular Ra/Dec conception devised by Flamsteed then
good for you but it runs off an astrological framework and not fit for
human consumption.Not only can I graphically show you what you believe
via Newton's agenda,I can actually show you how it plays out
observationally -

http://www.opencourse.info/astronomy/introduction/02.motion_stars_sun/celest=
ial_sphere_anim.gif

http://www.belugalakeobservatory.com/photos/thumbnails/polaris-stasr-trails%=
20copy_700x700.jpg

That is what happens when you try to justify the motions of ther Earth
by using a framework based on equidistant stars returning in 23 hours
56 minutes 04 seconds.You end upo being the most cretinous creature to
set foot on the planet,that is not an insult,that is an observational
fact.