alt.energy.renewable

On Mar 1, 12:13=A0am, "MooseFET" wrote:
> Good, sounds like H2O SCAM deal. =A0Now back to Gasoline, I already found =
a
> way to cut the fuel cost in half using your current combustion system, I
> don't want to file for a patent, it's too costly and time consuming. if BU=
SH
> pays me, then your problem is solved. =A0He spent $9b/day in IRAQ, if he p=
ays
> me only $2B, then US problem is solved.
>
> wrote in message
>
> news:6408cd4d-73dd-42ec-8b8e-8b1eac23deb2@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >I use to have some hope that biodiesel from algae might be a serious
> > fuel source some day, but after much exploration and doing the math,
> > it seems to me to be hardly worth the effort. =A0The following is the
> > new update to my webpage on the biofuel hoax at:
>
> >http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html
>
> > "The prospect of growing algae to make biodiesel has more positive
> > potential than making ethanol from switchgrass, but you are still
> > stuck with the fact that algae need solar energy to turn carbon
> > dioxide into fuel. =A0To make biodiesel, algae are used as organic solar=

> > panels which output oil instead of electricity. =A0Research reports brag=

> > that algae can produces 15 times more fuel per acre of land than
> > growing corn for ethanol, but that still means we would need
> > approximately 30 million acres of algae ponds in the USA to meet 100%
> > of our projected automotive fuel usage by the year 2022. =A0That figure
> > does not include fuel for aircraft and ships. =A0Those algae schemes
> > that use less land invariably call for feeding algae sugar. =A0The sugar=

> > must be made from corn or other crop, so you are simply trading
> > ethanol potential to make oil instead of vodka. =A0If you grow
> > genetically engineered super-algae in open-air ponds, the genetically
> > modified algae will immediately be carried to ponds, lakes,
> > reservoirs, and oceans all over the world in the feathers of migrating
> > birds, with unknown and possibly catastrophic consequences. Using
> > agricultural waste water is a good idea for producing algae, and algae
> > may be of use to our society for making small amounts of fuel,
> > fertilizer, chicken feed, and lubricants. =A0The acreage required to
> > replace all human oil consumption would obviously be impossible. =A0"
>
> > Agricultural "waste" is not really an answer either.
>
> > "Using agricultural "waste" to make biofuels has its own problems.
> > Removing unused portions of plants that are normally plowed under
> > increases the need for nitrogen fertilizers, which release the most
> > potent greenhouse gas of all; nitrous oxide. =A0Much of the residual
> > crop biomass must be returned to the soil to maintain topsoil
> > integrity, otherwise the rate of topsoil erosion will increase
> > dramatically. =A0If we mine our topsoil for energy, we may end up
> > committing slow agricultural suicide like the Mayan Empire. =A0Without
> > topsoil, the world starves!"
>
> > SEE "The biofuel hoax is causing a world food crisis!" at:
> >http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html
>
> > Christopher Calder
>
> Good, sounds like H2O SCAM deal.

The H20 is hardly a SCAM deal. Since it's a large part of
the reason we built metric-inch ROBOTS were idiots like GM
and US Steel.
And almost the whole part of the reason we built
lasers, fiber optics, mirocprocessors, PV cells, Optical
Computers,
and GPS for the quacks in QM.



=A0Now back to Gasoline, I already found a
> way to cut the fuel cost in half using your current combustion system, I
> don't want to file for a patent, it's too costly and time consuming. if BU=
SH
> pays me, then your problem is solved. =A0He spent $9b/day in IRAQ, if he p=
ays
> me only $2B, then US problem is solved.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -