> > Everything that we "try" to solve the mess is so blatantly obviously
> > wrong as to be difficult to believe that it isn't deliberate
> > sabotage. Hydrogen?!? Ethanol?!? WTF???
>
> Our problem is not that we lack solutions - it's that we lack the
> will to _implement_ solutions.
>
> The things I've been "trying" are working and seem so obviously
> right as to make it possible to believe that the success is
> deliberate. :-)
>
> Piecewise solutions at:
>
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/SC_Madison/http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/Stirling/
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USAhttp://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Passive solar, now THERE'S an answer to a question no one asked.
https://eed.llnl.gov/flow/pdf/USEnFlow02-quads.pdf
Take a look at the "residential" use sector and tell me what
percentage of that little shred you think you can ultimately replace
with your passive solar systems? At what cost?
Once again, it's a plan that sounds good, and hell, maybe it has its
uses, but it isn't even a beginning of a start of a consideration of
how this problem may ultimately be solved. How many of your units
have you sold (please answer in gigawatts)? Simply put, NO, we do not
have a solution to this problem, not at all.