alt.education

"Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in message
news:3b4a43af-4ac9-4559-938a-7c43cc19338a@q33g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 9:09 am, "teachrmama" wrote:
>> "Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in
>> messagenews:08e4c701-2823-4508-84b6-438d6e152391@h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 25, 11:50 pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
>> >> "Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in
>> >> messagenews:cc67e54d-9a69-4f8e-bdae-648bcb37948c@q33g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Feb 25, 7:18 pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
>> >> >> "SumBuny" wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>news:KmGwj.9897$0M3.5320@newsfe17.lga...
>>
>> >> >> > "Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:f70bc57f-9a1a-420e-8d60-7fac96059362@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >> On Feb 25, 11:26 am, "SumBuny"
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> "Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in
>> >> >> >>> messagenews:e9312895-179c-4cd5-869e-52d1d69913ef@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> >> >>> > On Feb 24, 7:50 pm, "SumBuny"
>> >> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> "Wide Eyed in Wonder" wrote in
>> >> >> >>> >> messagenews:ee560b35-9812-4957-b8e7-aea653d1b746@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> >> >>> >> > On Feb 24, 2:19 pm, c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
>> >> >> >>> >> > Kittrell)
>> >> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> In article
>> >> >> >>> >> >> <48416c2d-743e-4813-99c2-f4c36a60e...@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wide
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Eyed in Wonder writes:
>>
>> >> >> >>> >> > Then, what changed. Before she was answering my
>> >> >> >>> >> > questions.
>> >> >> >>> >> > Now,
>> >> >> >>> >> > she
>> >> >> >>> >> > refuses to do it. However, I have remained the same. The
>> >> >> >>> >> > only
>> >> >> >>> >> > change
>> >> >> >>> >> > was questions she couldn't answer fro me. Indeed, she is
>> >> >> >>> >> > RIGHT
>> >> >> >>> >> > NOW
>> >> >> >>> >> > answering questions about not answering questions, while
>> >> >> >>> >> > not
>> >> >> >>> >> > answering
>> >> >> >>> >> > my earlier questions she knows proves her inaccurate.
>>
>> >> >> >>> >> You are right in one thing...you have not changed--you have
>> >> >> >>> >> not
>> >> >> >>> >> answered
>> >> >> >>> >> *any* questions in this arena, and she was answering your
>> >> >> >>> >> questions.
>> >> >> >>> >> Then
>> >> >> >>> >> she changed and stopped answering your questions until you
>> >> >> >>> >> started
>> >> >> >>> >> answering
>> >> >> >>> >> hers. You cried foul....You wanted her to continue to
>> >> >> >>> >> answer
>> >> >> >>> >> your
>> >> >> >>> >> questions
>> >> >> >>> >> while you refused to answer any of hers...
>>
>> >> >> >>> >> Sounds rather childish, to me....
>>
>> >> >> >>> > Ideas given in the thread above to teachermama, in spite of
>> >> >> >>> > her
>> >> >> >>> > inability to meet her own standard.
>>
>> >> >> >>> ROTFLOL--you *are* funny! She has "met her own standard" by
>> >> >> >>> continiously
>> >> >> >>> answering *your* questions....she is just demanding that you
>> >> >> >>> meet
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>> same
>> >> >> >>> standard that you set for others....to answer questions....
>>
>> >> >> >> I gave her the answer she sought. We'll see if she will do the
>> >> >> >> same.
>>
>> >> >> > Are you talking about the "nonanswer" where you did not give a
>> >> >> > lesson,
>> >> >> > but
>> >> >> > an activity?
>>
>> >> >> Yep--that's the one he is talking about. I really don't think he
>> >> >> has
>> >> >> any
>> >> >> idea at all about writing goals and objectives. Does he even know
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> educational standards of his own state? I was under the impression
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> he
>> >> >> was attending school to become a teacher. Maybe they haven't
>> >> >> gotten
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> goals and objectives" part yet.
>>
>> >> > I have you some details. That is what you asked for. Answer my
>> >> > questions. If you think I only partially answered you (not true),
>> >> > give me a partial answer to my questions....but give me something or
>> >> > be a hypocrite.
>>
>> >> Actually, that isn't what I asked for. Here is what I said: *How,
>> >> specifically, do you
>> >> intend to teach children to save money if you ever find yourself
>> >> actually
>> >> teaching in a classroom?*
>> >> That would include more than the idea of starting savings accounts.
>> >> How
>> >> would you instill the idea of saving money, rather than just 'give the
>> >> teacher a coin every week.' I'm really not making fun of you,
>> >> Kenneth.
>> >> I'm
>> >> serious. Teaching a concept is far more than doing one activity and
>> >> saying
>> >> "I'm done." You have not elaborated at all on your introductory
>> >> activities,
>> >> ongoing activities other than the savings account, or concluding
>> >> activities.
>> >> You have not mentioned a single thing that the *chilcren* will do,
>> >> except
>> >> hand you money. Do you really expect them to learn to save money that
>> >> way?
>>
>> > So far, I've contributed some details on A plan to teach this
>> > concept. I'm not aware that you have proposed a detailed plan...or
>> > even any plan..on your own. Am I wrong? Why don't YOU add something
>> > to the discussion...or, do you have nothing to add here?
>>
>> I've already asked you if you would like me to explain how I would teach
>> this concept to my kindergarten class, but I have not received a
>> response.
>> I am truly concerned about your understanding of goals and objectives if
>> you
>> think that what you provided is adequate.
>
> In fact, I DID reply to this post of yours, before you typed this
> response. So, that is just a lie.

No it isn't. I read and respond in the order the posts appear on my
newsreader. I read and responded to this one before I read the other one.
You should make sure of your facts before you accuse someone of lying.

Go read my response (do some
> research) before condemning me.

You really do have a huge persecutin complex.