alt.education

"stevericks" wrote:
>All I get at the web address you provided is his post of :
>"Evolution wants you to believe that creatures can change their own DNA
>and respond to the environment around them at will. Who is behind this
>intelligent adaptation (what power at work)? The creature
>itself.Thus..Evolution = Pantheism (Nature is God)"
>...with a few more paragraphs. Is there more to it than this?

That's what Kennie wrote. To read the thread, click the discussion
link above it.

Here are a few more Kennie threads about evolution"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education/msg/6c3e35adf1bce9b8
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion/msg/486afc752c099e0f
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian/msg/4b05d8e974498198
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education/msg/06445e2e6f11f3da

Note that in many cases, he has posted the same message more than
once, sometimes with minor changes, a few months apart. And if
ignored he does this silly "bump" comment to try to get his ignored
post to the top of the Google thread heap (at least that is what I
think he is trying to do - one never knows for sure with Kennie).

His arguments about Satan causing hurricanes, and God using them to
punish sinful cities like New Orleans, but that they respond to Pat
Robertson's prayers, are equally silly, but with even less content.

>By the way, the one thing I try to share with other Christians who are
>wanting to take issue with evolutionists is for them to LEARN WHAT THE
>THEORY REALLY SAYS!

Kennie seems incapable at learning. He's posted more or less the same
things for the last 5-6 years, making the same silly mistakes.

Too many Christians end up looking ignorant and stupid
>because they state what they THINK the theory says and it is completely
>incorrect. The best way to argue against something is first to clearly
>understand it and be careful that you never misrepresent the "other side"
>that you disagree with. Once you make this mistake, you loose your own
>credibility.

Do you think Kennie cares about credibility?

>By the way, the original poster of this info about evolution is a prime
>example of what I warn against. The person is misrepresenting what
>evolutionists say, so why would I ever trust his logic or reasoning? People
>that really understand the theory would likely believe he is trying to "pull
>a fast one" since he starts with incorrect information.

That's Kennie - always trying to pull a fast one. Several of us have
dedicated ourselves to making sure that he doesn't succeed. It's a
waste of time, but entertaining, and every once in a while I learn
something while researching a new way to laugh at him. And sometimes,
we even mention education, as in the couple of posts in this thread
that addressed my alma mater (but that isn't k12 education alas)

lojbab