alt.education

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
>> >> And...of course...YOU have provided details for your answers to my
>> >> questions...not just ideas but details? Indeed. Have you given
>> >> details about ANY idea you've posted in any of the recent Educational
>> >> threads in which we have conversed? Or, do you hold a different
>> >> standard for me than you do yourself (a hypocrite)?
>>
>> > Oh, it appears that `teachrmama' holds herself to exactly
>> > the same standards that she holds you to: you won't post
>> > details of your "plan", she won't post details of hers.
>>
>> > Seems fair enough...
>>
>> Thing is, I don't recall posting any "plans," then refusing to give details
>> when asked. I am glad to share my ideas and ways to accomplish then with
>> others. But, then, I don't post about things that I know absolutely nothing
>> about.
>
>I guess until you provide details, no one should answer your
>questions...right?

She has nothing to provide details about.

*I* on the other hand, DID answer your question about my educational
background, in considerable detail, and *I* asked you more or less the
same question that teachrmama did. So you really have no reason for
not providing details other than the honest one that you can't.

>Also, is it possible...even POSSIBLE that I know
>"ABSOLUTELY NOTHING" about money management or saving?

It is quite possible that everything you THINK you know is wrong.
Your track record at being wrong is rather spectacularly successful.

>If not, you lied there, and you are proving your prejudice.

You continue to be wrong about the meaning of "lie" and the meaning of
"prejudice", among other things.

And you aren't convincing *anyone* (except yourself) of your own
virtue or anyone else's failings.

Give it up.

Or explain how you want schools to "teach kids to save money". Or
admit that you can't.

lojbab