I wonder how posting christiansuperhero under ones name is relevant to the
topic? Oh, a question. Let me ask some more. Okay? Oh, another question
without even thinking about it. I don't have to give any answers, just
answer questions with questions, just like Jesus did. Of course, if you
look at the outcome of that, the people he did that to didn't seem to like
it and eventually nailed him to a cross.
As I do have a religion minor so could I be drawing from my academic
experience. Also, why would anyone call themselves a christiansuperhero?
Oooh, another question. I'm getting good at this. In my religion, there is
only one superhero. How about yours?
Also, I thought the term Christian was written with a capital C. Now, where
did someone go to school?
"teachrmama"
news:fpamfo01okt@news4.newsguy.com...
>
> "Wide Eyed in Wonder"
> news:295f5043-c730-46e6-9086-5001a428e963@p43g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 17, 7:02 pm, "teachrmama"
>>> "Wide Eyed in Wonder"
>>> messagenews:be067637-b11c-40e7-acca-17f773e27463@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> > On Feb 17, 6:51 pm, "stevericks"
>>> >> Bob,
>>>
>>> >> How about this answer for him. Hopefully, with the schooling he has
>>> >> received, he might understand it.
>>>
>>> > So, I guess we see what your prejudice is against me...I'm a Bible
>>> > believing Christian. Oh, the horror...right?
>>>
>>> I didn't get the impression that he was attacking your religion--after
>>> all,
>>> he quoted the Bible, which you profess to believe, right? Have you ever
>>> stopped to think that you ask a lot of questions, and never even try to
>>> answer the questions that others ask you? Do you really want to have a
>>> discussion? Or do you just want to prove that you are **right**?
>>
>> How is this discussion about religion relevant to saving money? Also,
>> you think the graphic insertion (the 666 file) was a part of a non-
>> critical discussion?
>
> Come on, get real, Kenneth. Are you ever going to answer any questions?
> Ever? Instead of just asking question? Are you even capable of answering
> questions? It seems impossible to have a real discussion with you, though
> I have tried, because you *attack* rather than answer, if someone
> disagrees with you.
>