alt.education

"William Flax" wrote in message
news:jRHuj.11709$J41.11695@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
> See Below:
> "SueDoeCyAnts" wrote in message
> news:Xns9A4981909F3C2OriginaliseThisThief@198.186.190.163...
>> on Tue 19 Feb 2008 10:48:34a
>> "William Flax" posted
>> in news:6wFuj.9858$0o7.1848@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:
>>
>> > If McCain has the Republican nomination virtually locked up,
>> > why do some of us still campaign actively for Ron Paul?
>>
>> One personality trait that seems shared amongst
>> all of the avidly Paulifried is
>> An ability to remain steadsfast facing head
>> into the howling wind of irrefutable facts.
>>
> It seems that my argument is built on a reasoned approach to irrefutable
> facts. On the other hand, yours is based upon an ex cathedra
> pronouncement.
> Just what facts am I supposedly ignoring? From the start, I conceded
> McCain
> would get the nomination. My post looks beyond that probability.
>
> Now, on the other hand, if you want to debate the Bush foreign policy, why
> don't you just have at it!

OK, you win. Paul's gonna win the nomination. Here's a cookie.

[plonk]