alt.education

See Below:
"SueDoeCyAnts" wrote in message
news:Xns9A4981909F3C2OriginaliseThisThief@198.186.190.163...
> on Tue 19 Feb 2008 10:48:34a
> "William Flax" posted
> in news:6wFuj.9858$0o7.1848@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:
>
> > If McCain has the Republican nomination virtually locked up,
> > why do some of us still campaign actively for Ron Paul?
>
> One personality trait that seems shared amongst
> all of the avidly Paulifried is
> An ability to remain steadsfast facing head
> into the howling wind of irrefutable facts.
>
It seems that my argument is built on a reasoned approach to irrefutable
facts. On the other hand, yours is based upon an ex cathedra pronouncement.
Just what facts am I supposedly ignoring? From the start, I conceded McCain
would get the nomination. My post looks beyond that probability.

Now, on the other hand, if you want to debate the Bush foreign policy, why
don't you just have at it!