alt.education

On 2 Mar 2008 23:12:00 -0500, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

>In article <13smt6og7dn7v43@corp.supernews.com>,
>Tani Jantsang© wrote:
>>
>>"Pisano" wrote in message
>>news:fjrjs3lobsdoh6pfv0a34pi48h704hecu9@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENA0vxLwoq4
>>>
>>> Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KloETuVJx2c
>>>
>>> Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIBPGvK7Pg0
>>>
>>> Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFfhObkxzBE
>>>
>>>
>>> Question:
>>>
>>> How many people even know that he is still running?
>>>
>>
>>I know he's running - but aside from the end to the war, repeal of anchor
>>baby laws and sending illegals back - the guy would set the country back to
>>where it was before the depression - and the SAME SHIT would result from it.
>>He's a libertarian - and well, the USA is just too fucking BIG for that kind
>>of shit now. We DO NEED big government to get anything done. Laizzes faire
>>is a joke. It's idealistic caca
>
>
>
>
>Ron Paul rejects evolution
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPoCsC8VT9g&e
>
> AUDIENCE MEMBER: I saw you in one of the earlier debates, all of
> the candidates were asked if they believe the theory of evolution
> to be true and they had a show of hands, but I didn.t see which
> way you voted, and I was wondering if you believe it to be true,
> and should it be taught in our schools.
>
> PAUL: First, I thought it was a very inappropriate question, you
> know, for the presidency to be decided on a scientific matter. And
> I, um, I think it.s a theory, theory of evolution, and I don.t
> accept it, you know, as a theory.. I just don.t think we.re at a
> point where anybody has absolute proof, on either side.
>
>
>Here's a summary of all the legislation that Paul has not just voted
>for but sponsored. The anti-war folks that back him just for troop
>withdrawal should be in for a surprise. His gold standard stuff is k00k
>economics according to essentially all economists.
>
> http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/11/ron-pauls-record-in-congress.html
>
>He's been a busy little legislator.
>
>------
>


You left this one out:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/


Then there's this . . .

=-=

What Gunny Had To Say:


Interestingly enough, the 'explanations' of Paul's record which this
blogger provides, contradict the facts of his record posted right with
them.

For example, the blogger posts a bill sponsored by Ron Paul to allow
Congress to prosecute people who destroy flags OWNED BY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT. But in the bloggers analysis, he claims that Paul's bill
would make it illegal for people to burn flags which they themselves
own.

Looking through the entire post, this pattern s repeated throughout
the list of bills. In nearly every single instance, the bloggers
'analysis' of Paul's legislation is radically different from what the
legislation itself actually says.

Of course, the comments reflect people's inability to separate the
biased 'analysis' from the actual record itself. The reader comments
almost universally reflected the positions of the bloggers analysis,
instead of the record itself.

The only issue which they got even close to, was in Dr Paul's stance
on the right to life. Ron Paul does believe in the right to life,
which comes from his several decades as a registered and licensed
OBGYN, having delivered over 4000 babies in his lifetime.
--
Gunny Freedom's Blog: http://libertyline.blogspot.com/
Gunny's Hangout: http://www.rwva.org/yabbse/index.php "Liberty's
Price"
Become a Rifleman: http://appleseedinfo.org/