Group: alt.education
From: MACK DADDY
Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Obama Against War on Terror?

On Feb 26, 2:16=A0pm, "Jerry Okamura" wrote:
> Sayng you were against a war, that has already happened is kind of
> meaningless..
>
> "Cary Kittrell" wrote in message
>
> news:fphm3o$su5$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
>
>
>
> > In article
> > Wide
> > Eyed in Wonder writes:
>
> >> According to recent news, Obama said he opposed "this war in 2002."
>
> > Good for him. =A0So did I. =A0So did millions of people world-wide.
> > We saw it coming. =A0We saw that Bush was going to contrive
> > a way to invade, come what may. =A0We saw that it would
> > drain resources from a conflict that actually might
> > have something to do with the war on terror: Afghanistan.
> > We saw that Bush was determined to go ahead anyway.
> > And we opposed it.
>
> > And by very early 2003 there were massive global protests, worldwide
> > protests, even though "we weren't IN Iraq" at that point.
>
> >> We weren't IN Iraq in 2002. =A0So, the only war he could be referring t=
o
> >> would be the war against Al Queda.
>
> > May I get a show of hands here? =A0Can we include this statement
> > in Conspiracy Ken's Ten Greatest Leaps of Illogic?
>
> >> So, if Obama becomes President,
> >> I'm guessing we can expect to face the war HERE (terrorist attacks),
>
> > Considering that the war in Iraq has nothing to do with terrorist
> > attacks over here -- and never did -- that's simply another "huh?"
> > emanating From the Desk of Conspiracy Ken.
>
> > -- cary
>
> >> instead of overseas, since Obama is calling for soldiers from that war
> >> (the one going on in 2002) to come home.
>
> >> Kenneth Clifton
> >> christiansuperhero.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WAR IS SOMETHING REALLY STUPID, THAT REALLY STUPID PEOPLE TRY TO USE
TO TRY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS, BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO METLEY WETODDED TO TRY
TO WORK OUT PROBLEMS.

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass