alt.education

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

>According to recent news, Obama said he opposed "this war in 2002."
>We weren't IN Iraq in 2002. So, the only war he could be referring to
>would be the war against Al Queda. So, if Obama becomes President,
>I'm guessing we can expect to face the war HERE (terrorist attacks),
>instead of overseas, since Obama is calling for soldiers from that war
>(the one going on in 2002) to come home.
>Kenneth Clifton
>christiansuperhero.com
>
>
That was the time to oppose entering into such a disastrous & needless
war. It is too late to oppose a war after your president is already in it!

Barack opposed going to war, which was when Bush & company were
preparing to bomb the hell out of Baghdad & destroy Iraq along with
killing around a million innocent men, women & children. We can expect
to face mad terrorists in our homeland because we committed to the
needless injustice & horrible terror of modern warfare that fuels
hatred, spawns & spreads it exponentially beyond containment.

Such "injustice" is the true enemy of the U.S. & much of our world. -
udarrell . com

--
WISDOM PRINCIPLED EMPOWERMENT COMMUNICATIONS -
THE REAL POLITICAL ISSUES & WISDOM Principled PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT

http://www.udarrell.com/ (Continually Updated)

"The Center for Public Integrity," 935 Documented False Statements in two years so Bush & company could invade Iraq."

"War is the greatest of all crimes; and yet there is no aggressor who
does not color his crime with the pretext of justice." - Voltaire

http://www.udarrell.com/my_pages2.htm
(A page full of links to my pages.)

"Reality Is Not An Easy Thing To Be Confronted With, or to ACCEPT." - Darrell