alt.energy.renewable

> > Nuclear power has sent over a million plus humans to early deaths.
>
> Gibberish, like most of the rest of the post. Even if true, the UN
> estimates that emissions from fossil fuels and biomass energy kill
> around 2.5 million people per year. That number would be even higher but
> for nuclear energy, which would still be saving lives even with your
> made up 'million plus' figure.
>
> First world, Former Soviet and Third World countries with nuclear power
> plants don't have shorter life expectancies than their counterparts. In
> fact
> the opposite tends to be true. Japan has around 50 nuclear reactors and
> has
> a very high life expectancy. France gets around 75% of its electricity
> from
> nuclear and has a very high life expectancy. Scandinavia uses nuclear
> energy, boarders countries with nuclear energy, and was in the path of
> Chernobyl radiation... and has high life expectancies.
>
> The report "Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities" (Us
> Dept of Health and Human Services. NIH Publication No. 90-874) Shows no
> increased age adjusted cancer rates in counties with nuclear facilities
> versus control counties. (This is hospital stats, not data from nuclear
> utilities.)
>
> Karl Johanson

Karl, you're wasting your breath. please reread my "definition of
anti-nuke" piece.