alt.energy.renewable

> > The fact is that radioactive storage is a not an unsolved scientific
> > problem, it is an unsolved POLITICAL problem, and it is precisely the
> > anti-nukes who have made it so.
>
> An "anti-nuke" being anyone who questions it?

No, an anti-nuke being anyone who opposes it in defiance of reality.
In opposition to the opinions of every reactor engineer, waste storage
specialist, and nuclear physicist. In denial of tens of thousands of
reactor years of reliable service, in contradiction of engineering
showing 8 nines of reliability on long-term storage, and in denial of
fundamental physics that show it safe. That's an anti-nuke.

Ask all the questions you like, but when you receive an answer that is
well researched, backed by real world data, and adequately answers the
question, shut the hell up.