Group: alt.energy.renewable
From: "00BNZ" <00BNZ@dooooooooodoooooo.com>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: IPCC On The Run At Last


"Lloyd" wrote in message
news:4596e563-910b-44c0-982e-ed6bd479101a@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 26, 7:52 pm, "00BNZ" <00...@dooooooooodoooooo.com> wrote:
>> "Lloyd" wrote in message
>>
>> news:1a20d308-bed8-4a11-ba6d-e7399b34ae48@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Mar 25, 8:52 pm, "0Z0BN" <0Z...@doooooooodoooooo.com> wrote:
>> >> OnTheWeb: Bob Carter
>>
>> >> March 25, 2008
>>
>> >>http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2352
>>
>> >> QUOTE: "To avoid acknowledging the recent flat-lining of global
>> >> temperature,
>>
>> > Considering 2005 is the hottest year ever, when did it flat-line?
>>
>> --
>> Let's see, all years, possibly bar 2005, since 1998 are in a cooling
>> trend.
>> That's 8 out of 9 years.
>> The majority agrees that the globe has cooled since 1998.
>>
>> Warmest Regards
>>
>> Bonzo
>>
>> ". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in
>> Germany
>> report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years,
>> accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature
>> over
>> the last 100
>> years."http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175
>
> The warmest years on record are 2005, then 1998, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
>
> So again, when did it flat-line?

2007 Will Be Globally Coolest Year Since 2000

Andrew Bolt

Thursday, November 22, 2007



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/another_year_of_non_heating/



The IPCC says the science is settled and we're hotting to hell. Well,
some of the IPCC scientists say that.



But Dr David Whitehouse - astronomer, former BBC science correspondent,
and author of The Sun: A Biography - is buying more jumpers:



The fact that the recent warming period can be divided into two distinct
periods is surely instructive and has a direct bearing on the IPCC's
projections for the future and its mitigation strategies. The period
1980 -98 was one of rapid warming - a temperature anomaly of about 0.6
degrees C or 0.3 deg C per decade (CO2 rose from 340ppm to 370ppm).
Since then the global temperature has been flat (whilst the CO2 has
risen from 370ppm to 380ppm) meaning that the global temperature is
about 0.3 deg less than it would have been had the rapid increase
continued.



The 1980 - 98 increase is generally similar to the increase seen between
1910 and 1940 which was 0.6 deg C in 30 years. It may be that the
current flatlining of global temperature will be similar to that seen
between 1940 and 1980 in that it will be followed by another increase
(as the UK's Met Office believes will commence in 2009) but we don't
know.



Incidentally, all the indications are that the global temperature of
2007 will be the coolest since 2000. This is interesting as there have
been no significant volcanic events and no La Nina cooling.



There is a growing school of thought that suggests that the next solar
cycle, cycle 24, could be weak and possibly the start of a prolonged
period of low activity. There are certainly signs of a decline after a
significant increase in solar activity throughout most of the last
century. In the past when this has occurred the Earth has cooled though
by what mechanism is unknown.
--



Warmest Regards

Bonzo


The Fourth Report of the IPCC might just as well decree the
suppression of all climatology textbooks, and replace them in our
schools with press communiqués. ... Day after day, the same mantra -
that 'the Earth is warming up' - is churned out in all its forms. As
'the
ice melts' and 'sea level rises' the Apocalypse looms ever nearer!
Without realizing it, or perhaps without wishing to, the average
citizen in bamboozled, lobotomized, and lulled into mindless acceptance.
... Non-believers in the greenhouse scenario are in the
position of those long ago who doubted the existence of God ...
Marcel Leroux

It should be abundantly clear by now that the AGW hypothesis is
contradicted by the facts/measurements/observations and should
therefore be abandoned and be substituted by a hypothesis which
better matches the facts.
- Hans Labohm


Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass