alt.education

CB wrote:
> wrote in message
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:57:06 -0500, "CB"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>The brick wall be the 'change' you can't accept in knowing the Evil that
> >>was
> >>Saddamn would no longer be 'tolerated' in a post 9/11 world.
> >
> > Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11
>
> Goo goo?

Well did he?

> >>American policy
> >>supported Saddamn up until she couldn't trust him.
> >
> > We never trusted Saddam---ever.
>
> We trusted him to keep the Kook of Iran in containment. Now that job will be
> done with the base America has in Iraq.

"trusted"? First you whine he was a monster, etc, but that's ok?

> > The issue isn't Saddam---it's Bush
>
> The issue 'is' the Islamo-fascist hydra which had a big-o head lopped off.

What head was that?

> > HE lied to us about Saddam---bush was proven a
> > liar---and still attacked Iraq
>
> The UNSC's 17 resolutions were ignored by your Uncle Daddy. The lie 'is'
> that Liberals in the UN and in Congress would have continued to tolerate the
> Butcher until America's Doom's Day.

Not America's problem.

> >>If left up you Libs there would never be a policy change that defends
> >>American interests from the likes of ben Laden, Saddamn or the Kook of
> >>Iran.
> >
> > Saddam was a UN problem- under their jurisdiction.
>
> America 'is' a member of the UN

Wow, you got one.

> >>It just ain't fair that Saddamn was thumped huh, brick head?
> >
> > It's not fair that FOUR THOUSAND of OUR troops died for
> > no reason
>
> It's a high price for freedom of which you discount as "no reason"

A price YOU have no intention of ever facing. Typical republicon coward.