alt.energy.renewable

On Mar 29, 1:35 pm, "00BNZ" <00...@dooooooooodoooooo.com> wrote:
> "Fran" wrote in message
>
> news:a66a7284-f877-4cc2-a1f8-bc8d84b535ec@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> It's always good to have facts in front of you -- 'the good oil' so to
> speak
> Year C F
> 2005 0.60 1.08
> 1998 0.58 1.04
> 2002 0.56 1.01
> 2003 0.56 1.01
> 2007 0.55 0.99
> 2006 0.54 0.97
> 2004 0.53 0.96
> 2001 0.49 0.89
> 1997 0.46 0.83
> 1995 0.40 0.72
> *********************************
>
> HMMMMMMM ... let's see...
>
> 2007, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2002, and 2001 are all COOLER than 1998 and
> 2005.
> Yep, looks like a COOLING trend to me!

Which just goes to show that you are unable to read a line of figures
and understand them in context. 1998 was anomalously warm, as it was
driven by a severe El Nino, which, last time I checked, your lot
weren't attributing to climate change. Take that out and 1998 is
probably about 0.2 degrees cooler and all the other years warmer.
2007 wasn't quite as warm as it might have been due to a La Nina
event, -- factor that in and it leaps to number 1. This is hardly a
cooling trend. Even your maets at 'Canada free disinformation' talk
about this as 'probably' an ascending pattern.

> Are you dyslexic or something Fran baby?

Neither dyslexic nor, as in your case, either dishonest or
transparently stupid -- probably both.

Fran