alt.education

on Sun 02 Mar 2008 11:03:40p
Pisano posted
in news:ql8ns31k9vosidrjjgfvclhcsj61nghrnh@4ax.com:

> On 2 Mar 2008 22:59:02 -0500, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
>>In article <3jmms3tka9ul697uiapfs4nucgicj2hqra@4ax.com>,
>>Pisano wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYLVgMF9R9g
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Ron Paul rejects evolution
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPoCsC8VT9g&e
>>
>> AUDIENCE MEMBER: I saw you in one of the earlier debates,
>> all of the candidates were asked if they believe the theory
>> of evolution to be true and they had a show of hands, but I
>> didn.t see which way you voted, and I was wondering if you
>> believe it to be true, and should it be taught in our
>> schools.
>>
>> PAUL: First, I thought it was a very inappropriate question,
>> you know, for the presidency to be decided on a scientific
>> matter. And I, um, I think it.s a theory, theory of
>> evolution, and I don.t accept it, you know, as a theory.. I
>> just don.t think we.re at a point where anybody has absolute
>> proof, on either side.
>>
>>Here's a summary of all the legislation that Paul has not just
>>voted for but sponsored. The anti-war folks that back him just
>>for troop withdrawal should be in for a surprise. His gold
>>standard stuff is k00k economics according to essentially all
>>economists.
>>
>> http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/11/ron-pauls-record-in-
>> congress.html
-- Tiny Url: --
>>
>>He's been a busy little legislator.
>>
>
> You left this one out:
>
> http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/
>
>
> Then there's this . . .
>
> =-=
>
> What Gunny Had To Say:
>
>
> Interestingly enough, the 'explanations' of Paul's record which
> this blogger provides, contradict the facts of his record posted
> right with them.
>
> For example, the blogger posts a bill sponsored by Ron Paul to
> allow Congress to prosecute people who destroy flags OWNED BY
> THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. But in the bloggers analysis, he claims
> that Paul's bill would make it illegal for people to burn flags
> which they themselves own.
>

Well gunny seems to have a very significant problem with reading
comprehension. Was he home-schooled?

From Library of Congress' Thomas legislative database:
H.J. Res. 80:

H.J. Res. 82

-----------------------------------------------

H.J. Res. 80
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress... (Introduced
in House)

105th CONGRESS, 1st Session

H. J. RES. 80

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress to prohibit
destruction of federally owned flags.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 10, 1997

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress to prohibit
destruction of federally owned flags.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of
each House concurring therein), That the following article is
proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States,
which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the
Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of
the several States within seven years after the date of its
submission for ratification:

`Article--

`SECTION 1. The States shall have power to prohibit the
physical destruction of the flag of the United States and Congress
shall have the power to prohibit destruction of federally owned
flags.'.

-----------------------------------------------

H.J. Res. 82
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress... (Introduced
in House)

105th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 82

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress to prohibit
destruction of federally owned flags.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 12, 1997

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
authorizing the States to prohibit the physical destruction of the
flag of the United States and authorizing Congress to prohibit
destruction of federally owned flags.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each
House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed
as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which
shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the
Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of
the several States within seven years after the date of its
submission for ratification:

`Article --

`SECTION 1. The States shall have power to prohibit the
physical destruction of the flag of the United States and Congress
shall have the power to prohibit destruction of federally owned
flags.'.

-----------------------------------------------

Are you sure the poster's pseudo wasn't "gunny-sack"?