alt.education

On Mar 3, 2:03=A0am, Pisano wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2008 22:59:02 -0500, ady...@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <3jmms3tka9ul697uiapfs4nucgicj2h...@4ax.com>,
> >Pisano =A0 wrote:
>
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DPYLVgMF9R9g
>
> >Ron Paul rejects evolution
>
> > =A0 =A0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DyPoCsC8VT9g&e
>
> > =A0 =A0AUDIENCE MEMBER: I saw you in one of the earlier debates, all of
> > =A0 =A0the candidates were asked if they believe the theory of evolution=

> > =A0 =A0to be true and they had a show of hands, but I didn.t see which
> > =A0 =A0way you voted, and I was wondering if you believe it to be true,
> > =A0 =A0and should it be taught in our schools.
>
> > =A0 =A0PAUL: First, I thought it was a very inappropriate question, you
> > =A0 =A0know, for the presidency to be decided on a scientific matter. An=
d
> > =A0 =A0I, um, I think it.s a theory, theory of evolution, and I don.t
> > =A0 =A0accept it, you know, as a theory.. I just don.t think we.re at a
> > =A0 =A0point where anybody has absolute proof, on either side.
>
> >Here's a summary of all the legislation that Paul has not just voted
> >for but sponsored. The anti-war folks that back him just for troop
> >withdrawal should be in for a surprise. =A0His gold standard stuff is k00=
k
> >economics according to essentially all economists.
>
> > =A0http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/11/ron-pauls-record-in-congress.htm=
l
>
> >He's been a busy little legislator.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 You left this one out:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Then there's this . . .
>
> =3D-=3D
>
> What Gunny Had To Say:
>
> Interestingly enough, the 'explanations' of Paul's record which this
> blogger provides, contradict the facts of his record posted right with
> them.
>
> For example, the blogger posts a bill sponsored by Ron Paul to allow
> Congress to prosecute people who destroy flags OWNED BY THE FEDERAL
> GOVERNMENT. =A0But in the bloggers analysis, he claims that Paul's bill
> would make it illegal for people to burn flags which they themselves
> own.
>
> Looking through the entire post, this pattern s repeated throughout
> the list of bills. =A0In nearly every single instance, the bloggers
> 'analysis' of Paul's legislation is radically different from what the
> legislation itself actually says.
>
> Of course, the comments reflect people's inability to separate the
> biased 'analysis' from the actual record itself. =A0The reader comments
> almost universally reflected the positions of the bloggers analysis,
> instead of the record itself.
>
> The only issue which they got even close to, was in Dr Paul's stance
> on the right to life. =A0Ron Paul does believe in the right to life,
> which comes from his several decades as a registered and licensed
> OBGYN, having delivered over 4000 babies in his lifetime.
> --
> Gunny Freedom's Blog: =A0http://libertyline.blogspot.com/
> Gunny's Hangout: =A0http://www.rwva.org/yabbse/index.php"Liberty's
> Price"
> Become a Rifleman: =A0http://appleseedinfo.org/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Great job in the delivery of your informed response. Careful though,
everyone believes in the"right to life" in one way or another. Titles
offend, offending often closes doors. bj