On Apr 2, 7:45=A0pm, "Glenn Jensen"
> I realize it seems inefficient to convert from circular motion at the top =
of
> the windmill, to "up and down", back to circular motion on the ground, but=
> this is what I have to work with. =A0Unless I redesign the entire old styl=
e
> windmill, this would be the simplest for me to convert back to rotary moti=
on
> on the ground. =A0Just curious if anyone has done this before. =A0The idea=
of a
> Crankshaft on the bottom, with a flywheel to maintain the momentum of the
> "up and down" motion was an idea of mine as well.
>
> Thanks everyone for their help.
>
> Glenn"harry k"
>
> news:036c52f9-7926-44a8-bfc0-341a35a896d6@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 1, 5:52 pm, nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
>
> > Glenn Jensen
> > >Hey There:
>
> > >I have a farm windmill that produces up/down motion, about 4 inches of
> > >travel. Any idea how to convert this action into rotary motion, so as t=
o
> > >run a generator or alternator?
>
> > The windmill must be converting rotary motion to up-and-down motion
> > in the first place. I'm not expert on wind systems, but wouldn't it
> > make sense to take out the crankshaft or whatever that does the
> > conversion and mount your generator up on the windmill? You may need
> > a gearbox, though.
>
> > --
> > Please reply to: | President Bush is promoting Peace and Democracy
> > pciszek at panix dot com | in the Middle East by selling Weapons to the
> > Autoreply is disabled | King of Saudi Arabia.
>
> Hmmm....let's see. =A0Windmill starts with rotary motion, converted to
> upsy/downsy, coverted back to rotary...Nope, I don't see anything odd
> about that concept ;)
>
> Harry K- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Just 'funning' you. I spotted several problems with trying to put the
'works' at the top beginning with some sort of slip-ring to pick off
the generated juice.
Harry K