alt.education

On Apr 12, 8:20 am, Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
> In Variety magazine's article....
>
> http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117936783.html?categoryid=31&cs=1
>
> ...the entertainment reporters admit that the film is well-mounted and
> praise the aesthetics of the film (comparing this film to Michael
> Moore's Fahrenheit 911), all the while they attack the ideas that the
> film presents. This is common for the initial reviews of this film
> coming out. Almost all of them praise the technical film quality of
> the film, and some of them dispute the ideas the film seeks to promote
> (much the response ANY Christian film has faced...except that many
> Christian films were of much poorer quality). It would make sense
> that Stein, with his money and experience, could ensure this film
> would be a quality production to draw attention to the issue at
> hand...which...from these reviews...appears to have happened. People
> are discussing the issues, not the film, which is the whole point.
>
> So, this will be an interesting film to go and see what all the
> controversy is about, unless you evolved into a brain dead (and brain
> washed) political zombie.
>
> Kenneth Clifton
> christiansuperhero.com

I also find it interesting that these reviewers would falsely attack
the integrity and honesty of the film's makers, considering that
almost all of them gave false identities to get INTO the film. HA!
We are to assume that the lies will stop BEFORE the review...right?

Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com