alt.education

"Tom Snyder" wrote in message
news:47fb170e$0$24124$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> The state should get out of the social education business. It's a parent's
> repsonsibility to teach his/her children, not the state. Someone's
> viewpoint is going to rule, either the homosexual hedonist's or the
> Christian follower's. God defines what the family is in the Bible, not the
> hedonist's whim or lust. If the Supreme Court says that 2 + 2 = 5, does
> that make it true? No! So why should we follow its ignorant rulings on
> Church and State?
>
> "Raymond" wrote in message
> news:6d803957-5241-4ecf-846c-7694cb019e24@m1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
> Sorry to post at the top, but after reading this, it would seem if one
> is Gay they have a right to have their view taught in School, but if
> one is a Christian, or follow religion they can not. Seems that the
> Law that lets people say their kids can not hear of god, would apply
> to them that do not want their kids in school to learn of the
> homosexual teachings either. What gives here? When I was went to
> school the books used to teach the children had to be approved by the
> B of Education and the teacher could not teach stuff that was no
> accepted by the curriculum.
>
> Raymond
>


The _only_ thing that gay people have a right to is to not be abused because
they are gay. They are open to abuse for being an idiot, just like anybody
else but they should not be abused because they are gay. They have no right
to have their lifestyle immortalized by the government.

When government teaches my kids that their religion is wrong because it
teaches that homosexuality is right, then the freedom of religion and the
free expression thereof are compromised. Religious zealots can't go around
beating up homosexuals, and government ought not be in the business of
promoting homosexuality. Gee, government should keep its mouth shut.
Wouldn't _that_ be nice for a change?

It ain't gonna happen though.