alt.education

ayatollah obama wrote:
>In a weird way, I think we actually agree.
>>    You're confusing modern social convention with
>>    what's "natural". No such thing as a pedophile,
>>    necrophile or zoephile so far as 'nature' is
>>    concerned. Rats will hump dead rats, are they
>>    thus "necrophiles" ... or mearly "sexual" beasties
>>    which have spotted something that looks humpable ?
>>    Is the neighbors dog a 'homo' if it humps your leg ?
>
>Which is what I was saying, hormones are the reason, not genetics.

Genetics is what creates the apparatus that makes the hormones, and it
dictates the conditions under which those hormones are made.

>Our own choices decide whether its M/F-?, M-M, F-F, or M-F.

Your evidence is lacking.

Can you, right now, choose to respond sexually to the gender that you
normally don't respond to? I doubt it.

>That being homo is a lifestyle choice.

Your evidence is lacking.

lojbab