alt.education

On Apr 10, 10:53 am, b...@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:24:00 -0700 (PDT), last_p...@rogers.com wrote:
> >On Apr 9, 1:53=A0am, ayatollah obama
> >wrote:
> >> On Apr 7, 11:18=A0pm, Raymond wrote:
>
> >> > Sorry to post at the top, but after reading this, it would seem if one
> >> > is Gay they have a right to have their view taught in School, but if
> >> > one is a Christian, or follow religion they can not. =A0Seems that the
> >> > Law that lets people say their kids can not hear of god, would apply
> >> > to them that do not want their kids in school to learn of the
> >> > homosexual teachings either. =A0What gives here? =A0 When I was went to
> >> > school the books used to teach the children had to be approved by the
> >> > B of Education and the teacher could not teach stuff that was no
> >> > accepted by the curriculum.
>
> >> Religion IS taught in school... atheism, Nietzsche's Subjective
> >> morality. Being queer (sexual orientation impaired) is a lifestyle
> >> choice, or as I like to say... Not liking sex isn't hereditary
>
> >## Dead wrong
> > Sexual preferences [orientation] are genetic.
>
> Sexual BIASES are genetic, or at least an early-developmental
> thing, however actual "preference" is something added TO the
> innate bias and more a cultural/circumstantial thing. If you're
> biased to be very gay, then nobody's gonna talk you into being
> a hetero. But, if you're biased somewhere in the middle, you
> could be tweaked in either direction, or both. (everyone seems
> to forget the "both" option in these discussions - doesn't
> fit the convenient black & white 'logic'). There's also a
> 'neither' dimension to the equation.
>
> Regardless though, the only real 'solution' to this 'critical
> issue' is to realize that there ISN'T a critical issue at all.
> Doesn't matter where you fit in "homo/hetro/bi/neither-space",
> not in the least. There will be FAR more than enough hetrosex
> to over-perpetuate the species - and that's all "nature" and
> Darwin care about.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Following your logic, pedophiles, necrophiles, chicken f'ers, are that
way because of genetics. That they are pre-programmed to find little
kids (Mo-man did), dead people, and animals sexually attractive.

I could care less if someone is in a M-M or F-F relationship. Just
don't expect someone who has got past Jack-n-Jill to buy into your
bullshit logic. You probably believe in global warming, Bush stole
both elections, and the great pumpkin. Use the grey matter between
your ears, take it off the record mode and switch it to the process
mode, and stop listening to idiot professors who have no clue how the
real world works.