alt.education

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:27:18 GMT, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:

>
>"Tom Snyder" wrote in message
>news:47fb170e$0$24124$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> The state should get out of the social education business. It's a parent's
>> repsonsibility to teach his/her children, not the state. Someone's
>> viewpoint is going to rule, either the homosexual hedonist's or the
>> Christian follower's. God defines what the family is in the Bible, not the
>> hedonist's whim or lust. If the Supreme Court says that 2 + 2 = 5, does
>> that make it true? No! So why should we follow its ignorant rulings on
>> Church and State?
>>
>> "Raymond" wrote in message
>> news:6d803957-5241-4ecf-846c-7694cb019e24@m1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Sorry to post at the top, but after reading this, it would seem if one
>> is Gay they have a right to have their view taught in School, but if
>> one is a Christian, or follow religion they can not. Seems that the
>> Law that lets people say their kids can not hear of god, would apply
>> to them that do not want their kids in school to learn of the
>> homosexual teachings either. What gives here? When I was went to
>> school the books used to teach the children had to be approved by the
>> B of Education and the teacher could not teach stuff that was no
>> accepted by the curriculum.
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>
>
>The _only_ thing that gay people have a right to is to not be abused because
>they are gay. They are open to abuse for being an idiot, just like anybody
>else but they should not be abused because they are gay. They have no right
>to have their lifestyle immortalized by the government.

"their lifestyle" is YOUR concoction you fucking
dingbat

You'd be saying that blacks have no protection because
THEY have a "black life-style" that runs counter to
yours.


>When government teaches my kids that their religion is wrong because it
>teaches that homosexuality is right, then the freedom of religion and the
>free expression thereof are compromised.

Your religion clearly states it's "evil".......making
it imperative for education systems to counter the
religious stupidity you poor assholes exhibit.

FYI, you do NOT have unlimited "free speech" or
behavior you fruitcake.

>Religious zealots can't go around
>beating up homosexuals,

Religious or not, attacks on others are criminal. The
issue of "motivation", however, is codified now
(thankfully)---which means no one can beat up,
intimidate, or otherwise tie you to a fence, dying
because you're a fucking fundamentalist idiot.

>and government ought not be in the business of
>promoting homosexuality.

So when Brown v Board was passed (destroying Jim Crow)
the government "promoted" Blackness?

>Gee, government should keep its mouth shut.
>Wouldn't _that_ be nice for a change?

You mean like they used to do a century ago? Say,
Jeffyloon---isn't that how we got blacks dragged out of
Jail cells to be lynched, shot, beaten? Or the Passage
of Jim Crow laws, the dogs on marchers at Pettis
Bridge?

>It ain't gonna happen though.

We're gonna make damn sure it never does, stupid.