Group: alt.education
From: Darrell Stec
Date: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Antonin Scalia v. Thomas Jefferson

buckeye wrote:

> Darrell Stec wrote:
>
>>:|
>>:|And who the hell is Jim McMeans and why have you screwed around with the
>>:|sequence of the attributes and nesting of this thread?
>
>
> Some information on the 10 Commandments from a Jewish perspective
> Message #12366 of 12374
> [posted by Jim McMeans]
>
> The following information is from the Judaism 101 website.
> and contains a Jewish perspective on the 10 Commandments controversy.
>

[snipped misinformation]

Saying the same think twice is still not going to make it right. The Jewish
101 website and the hundreds of thousands of websites that copied it will
not make it right.

And as I asked, who the hell is this Jimmy character and why should anybody
think he is qualified to address the matter?

Does he read Hebrew? As he read the Masoretic texts, the Samaratan texts,
the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Greek Septuagint?

I won't repeat the questions I asked and which he did not address because it
seems he just likes to cut and paste something he read on the Internet.


>
> ***************************************************************
> You are invited to check out the following:
>
> The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
>
> American Theocrats - Past and Present
> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
>
> The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
>
> [and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
> Church and State in general, listed below]
>
> HRSepCnS · Historical Reality SepChurch&State
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
>
> ***************************************************************
> . . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
> respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
> take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why
> "a
> page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v.
> Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes,
> J.). Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir.
> 1992) . . .
> ****************************************************************
> USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
>
> "You pilot always into an unknown future;
> facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
>
> That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
> many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
>
> It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
> plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
> almost every media turn.
>
> *****************************************************************
> THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
> SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
>
> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
> ****************************************************************

--
Later,
Darrell Stec darstec@neo.rr.com

Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass