Group: alt.education
From: buckeye
Date: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: America is great because it was built on foundation of Bible principles

NoGoals wrote:

>:|On Mar 27, 4:51 am, buckeye wrote:
>:|> satyr wrote:
>:|> >:|On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:00:07 -0400, buckeye
>:|> >:|wrote:
>:|> >:|
>:|
>:|We got the snippage down below...
>:|
>:|> >:|>
>:|> >:|>America is great because it was built on foundation of Bible principles
>:|> >:|>http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OPINIO...
>:|> >:|>
>:|> >:|>Dee Wampler * March 22, 2008
>:|> >:|>
>:|> >:|> * Read Comments(45)
>:|> >:|>http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OPINIO...
>:|> >:|>
>:|> >:|>Easter is coming, the time of year when we recognize the death and
>:|> >:|>resurrection of a little known Jewish carpenter, Jesus of Nazareth.
>:|> >:|>Advertisement
>:|> >:|
>:|> >:|And the time when the Pagans fornicate in the fields to celebrate
>:|> >:|fertility. Look up the derivation of "Easter" and you will see who is
>:|> >:|properly celebrating it.
>:|> >:|
>:|> >:|>His birth is honored by state and federal holidays,
>:|> >:|
>:|> >:|Name one Federal Holiday based on Easter.
>:|> >:|
>:|>
>:|> I am kind of hoping that you do realize that author of this article will
>:|> never read your reply.
>:|>
>:|> The author was Dee Wampler and she wrote this as a commetary in a newpaper.
>:|>
>:|> America is great because it was built on foundation of Bible principleshttp://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OPINIO...
>:|>
>:|> Dee Wampler * March 22, 2008
>:|>
>:|> But you can comment to her commentary here:
>:|>
>:|> * Read Comments(45)http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OPINIO...
>:|>
>:|> >:|> and all 50 states
>:|> >:|>recognize the Almighty. Time is dated from his birth.
>:|> >:|
>:|> >:|Since he wasn't born in 0 AD, please explain.
>:|>
>:|> I am kind of hoping that you do realize that author of this article will
>:|> never read your reply.
>:|>
>:|> The author was Dee Wampler and she wrote this as a commetary in a newpaper.
>:|>
>:|
>:|This is the most cowardly non-attempt at defending an argument I've
>:|ever seen on usenet. And that's saying alot!


Would you like a quarter so you can call someone who gives a damn what you
say or think?

Do you make a habit of sticking your foot in your mouth?

If you are capable of using Google and actually used it, i.e. looked up
buckeye-elo in google groups you would find that I have been posting for
two years or longer Church State articles that Google provides me daily.
I don't post everyday but I receive the article URLs and a brief summation
daily.


Those are articles, pro and con with regards to church state in this
country.

I don't endorse any of them, I don't check out the articles for accuracy, I
don't verify them in any other way, nor do I normally comment on said
articles. Hell, often times I don't even read them.

I provide them to keep those who are interested in the topic current with
what is going on with church and state in the US as reported via mostly
newspapers across the country. Pay attention here this is one of those
important things if in class you would or should highlight:
I post pro and con articles. (I have pro and con articles on our
website---see signature, you know that thing you will find at the bottom of
this post)


In you have the intelligence you can actually verify everything I just got
through saying yourself. But, if you did you might realize what a idiot
you just showed yourself to be.


Now, on the other hand, if you bothered to check out my signature, any of
the URLs found in it, and had the ability to understand what you actually
read, that is assuming you can read. If you did that you would quickly find
out my position on the topic of church state, separation of church state.

However, you might be even more embarrassed, so be best for your comfort
level if you don't do any of what I have suggested about


Last but not least, I do, on occasion, not as often as in the past, get
into live ongoing discussions and or I do post items, articles etc that
I have gathered, compiled, written, edited, etc or articles that I do
endorse, have checked out and verified, unless otherwise stated. I have
been doing there here since Feb 1995 and just about anyone who has spent
any real time in these NewsGroups have no doubts where I stand on the issue
of church state separation.

It would be rather hard for most to confuse one of those with a simple
article, letter to editor, op-ed piece, commentary by another from a
newspaper somewhere in American or a blog or web site.

But I suppose I could take people like you into consideration, you know,
the less intelligent types and put like a disclaimer "Provided by Google
for those interested in church state current events. Posted without comment
or verification and the opinions expressed in said item may or may not
represent the thoughts, opinions or knowledge of buckeye-elo who is posting
that in this forum."

I could do that, but I won't


Have a great day.

***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:

The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm

American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm

The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html

[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]

HRSepCnS ยท Historical Reality SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/

***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote

"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"

That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.

It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.

*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************











Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass